Home

Advertisement

In an email to me, the SCF has completely denied that anyone there could have said they have changed their policy.  Well, that's baffling.  That means they don't believe in science and they refuse to acknowledge the body of evidence showing that vitamin D deficiency is a problem.  Wow.

The links to their corporate sponsors no longer work.  ?  Here are the new ones: Corporate Council & International Corporate Council.  Are there any companies on there that don't sell products to "protect" us from the sun?  Is this just a corporate front group?  I really don't know.

At least one other site says so.  Of course, it's put up by the Indoor Tanning Association!  LOL!  (At least they're honest about who they are.)

Edit 4/23/09: The corporate sponsor links have changed again.  Corporate CouncilInternational Corporate Council.

Tags:


AMDG

Yahoo recently put up an article on sunscreen and how it increases skin cancer.  It confirms several points I've found in digging around the online medical journal studies:
  • sunscreen does not protect against melanoma
  • relying on sunscreen instead of covering up or managing sun exposure increases skin cancer risk
  • our bizarre habits of semi-nudity at beaches are the cause of most of our skin damage
  • many sunscreens break down in the sun, some begin in just 15 minutes
  • most people use nowhere close to enough sunscreen to provide the claimed SPF level, anyway
  • chemicals in sunscreen cause DNA damage and may contribute to cancer, including skin cancer
(The EWG referenced in the article is the consumer group responsible for the Skin Deep Cosmetics Database linked in my other posts on sunscreen.)

Concludes the Yahoo article (from LiveScience.com):  "We merely think we are protected; few really are."

ETA: Link has gone; here's the original from LiveScience.com.

AMDG

Natural sunscreen: Olive oil

  • Jun. 27th, 2008 at 11:57 PM
Yes, olive oil.  No, I'm not kidding!

Unrefined olive & coconut oils, and shea butter, have a natural sun protection equivalent to about SPF 4-6.  That means if you are super pale and can't stay out more than 15 min w/o burning, extra virgin olive oil will give you an hour.  For most folks, most of the year, olive oil will get you 2-4hrs protection all by itself.

I've tried it.  It works.  With no chemicals, and the added bonus of being a wonderful moisturizer!  Affordable, too. (esp. compared to commercial natural sunscreens)

Caveat: do read my experience with using it over the course of a day in FL here.  I've found that re-applying will only get additional sun protection if preceeded by a good long session in the shade first.

(No, it's not greasy - just use a little, and it rubs right in.)
(No, it doesn't fry you.  Chances are, the "oil" you remember your friends coating themselves with in the 70s was "baby oil" (mineral oil, a petroleum product), which, according to one site (which I have NOT substantiated), dissolves the skin's natural oils, leaving you more exposed than if you had nothing at all!)
(We keep it in an old vitamin E oil container - holds an ounce or two - with a flip-top lid reclaimed from a lotion bottle.  Perfect, and lovely, too, with the golden oil & black lid.  Fits perfectly in my purse or glove box.)

AMDG

LYM, are you insane?  How can you recommend one day to avoid sunscreen, and the very next to get daily sun?  That's ridiculous!

simple sun-protective clothingHere's the thing.  We need sun.  We're biologically designed to be outside most of our lives, so it's not too surprising that it benefits us.  Not just for vitamin D, but for eyesight, circadian rhythms, mental wellness, and who knows what else we haven't yet discovered.  Our bodies haven't yet gotten the memo that we live indoor lives now.

But - we've migrated.  My pale skin is made for Germany, not Georgia.  I simply do not have enough melanin distributed throughout my skin to protect me from the sun at this latitude.  I can't just go outside and hang out all day in a tunic. 

Sunscreen seemed like a great solution - till we found out it doesn't do much of anything.  It prevents the symptoms of damage w/o preventing the damage itself.  Not to mention the chemicals that are layering onto our largest organ.  So what next?


AMDG

Sunscreen vs. Vitamin D : Controversy?

  • Jun. 20th, 2008 at 8:20 AM
Right now, I'm finding so much information that I can't figure out what to leave out and everything's getting too long!  But you'll love this one!

I happened across The Skin Cancer Foundation's website.  They have a stern warning that babies should always be kept out of the sun, and a section on common myths about sunscreen.  Their first myth is ...

"Wearing sunscreen can cause vitamin D deficiency." 

There's even a link to a page on this "controversy."  There, they say that some physicians believe that "the simple solution to the deficiency is 5-10 minutes of unprotected UV exposure ... two or three times a week."  They go on to state that most dermatologists and cancer groups "have argued strongly against this 'solution,' since all unprotected [sic] UV exposure contributes to cumulative skin damage[.]"

Sooooo, I called them.  And I mentioned the reports coming out in USA Today, the New York Times, the AJC, all over the place, that we're in a epidemic of vitamin D deficiency, specifically b/c we use too much sunscreen, and that even babies are being found deficient in huge numbers.  I asked if they were updating their website to reflect the latest recommendations: "Experts suggest at least 15 minutes of direct sun a day before slathering on sunscreen."

The guy answering the phone said, "We now recommend spending 10-15 minutes in the direct sun two or three times a week."

Great!  "So, will you be updating your website to reflect that immediately?"

"I'll put in a report that you requested that."

"Most people encounter your important organization through your website.  Shouldn't that be updated immediately?"

"I'll note that you requested that."

?  Why not do it now?  ?

I don't know, surely it has nothing to do with being funded by sunscreen manufacturers.

I did *not* used to be a skeptic.  I didn't!


AMDG

Overview: What does sunscreen do?

  • Jun. 19th, 2008 at 11:21 AM
What does sunscreen protect us from?
It seems it protects us from most UVB rays, which cause vitamin D production in the skin & cause a burn to start when we exceed our personal tolerance for the sun we're getting.  Most sunscreens made in the last few years also offer some degree of protection from UVA rays (which seem to be responsible for premature aging of the skin).  So that means, best case:

What does it definitely protect us from?

  • Sunburn
  • Wrinkles
But what happens when you take away the body's warning system - sunburn?  We spend far more time in the sun than our natural protection would allow, so:

What's the cost?
Three of the risk factors for non-melanoma skin cancer in a recent study - increased time in the sun, changes in clothing style (people who choose not to use sunscreen tend to wear clothing with more coverage), and immune suppression - are increased by sunscreen use.

Many people say, "Go to the beach, play golf, swim all day, but don't forget your sunscreen!" 

But when we put that sunscreen on, are we really protecting ourselves from anything at all?  Or just removing our natural warning system that we've exceeded our personal ability to process the good from the sun, and continuing to stay out with no protection at all, only the appearance of it? 

Get the details here.

AMDG

Starving for Sun - the vitamin D epidemic

  • Jun. 18th, 2008 at 9:14 AM
Monday's USA Today tells of a 14 year old boy, a normal boy, whose bones were invisible on X-rays.  They were so thin that they appeared clear - the doctor thought the machine was broken.  More tests revealed serious vitamin D deficiency - and bones 50% less dense than they should be.

Rickets is a rising epidemic in the US & Canada, especially among darker skinned folks.  Forty-two percent of US teens, & 40% of small children are D-deficient, which happens well before the rickets stage.  We've known for a while that up to 90% of adults are deficient.  Why?  Sun phobia

The body produces vitamin D upon exposure to the sun - but sunscreen prevents that.  We are told by dermatologists and skin cancer experts & every makeup & lotion company that we need SPF products every single day of our lives, winter included.  Sunscreens are mixed into everyday products from moisturizer to lipstick.  Check out just one example: "Apply liberally on face, neck and other exposed areas every morning."  Words like "dangerous" are nearly always attached to the word "sun."   Some phrases from one of my favorite personal care companies: "It [reflects] dangerous UVA-UVB rays."  "Whether it’s overcast, you’re in the car, just had a facial peel, walking the dog…you need a sunscreen!"


AMDG

Sunscreen doesn't prevent melanoma.  A few years ago, that was an established fact..  Did you know that?  I didn't.  I asked my mother if she knew sunscreen doesn't prevent deadly skin cancer and she said, "No, of course it doesn't!  But it prevents sunburn!"

If sunburn is the body's warning system that I've gotten more sun than my body can safely manage, then what happens when I remove that warning system, but continue to get the sun? 



AMDG

I was stupid yesterday.  I didn't pay enough attention to managing my sun exposure and boom, sunburn.  Bad.  The kind that (for me) hurts like heck & peels in a few days.   (My baby didn't burn at all.  My kids never do!  I'm still trying to decide if it's their tiny % Italian genes or my decades of bad eating/sugar.  They're all pale like me.)  And dang it, I forgot to bring my aloe leaf with me, so all I had was ... my spray bottle of vinegar!  

My grandmother used to put vinegar on my cousin when she laid out too long.  So I got dh to spray it on the burn, then I rubbed Burt's Bee's Res-Q ointment on it (got some good herbs in there, and says it's for burns, too!).  Did it again 4 hrs later.

This morning, the burn's half gone, & only the very worst corner of it still hurts - that only mildly so.  And no, I don't smell like a pickle.  :)

Here are a couple other folks on vinegar & sunburn:


AMDG

E FP TOZ LPED PECFD

  • May. 8th, 2008 at 9:29 AM
eye chartA few years ago, I heard about a study of Inuit (often called Eskimos) and their eyesight.  It was observed that once compulsory education was introduced, there was an immediate, dramatic increase (from 2% to 50%) in myopia - nearsightedness.  The same thing was observed in fishing villages in Hong Kong.  Wait.  Isn't it hereditary?

I'm way blind.  HUGE coke bottle glasses until they invented a way to make them thinner.  I *hate* being myopic.  I hate that w/o my glasses/contacts I can't read standard text unless it's, quite literally, 2 inches from my nose.  I hate knowing that, in a disaster, I'd probably die as soon as my last pair of glasses/contacts wore out, b/c I'd get eaten by a saber-toothed tiger or something.  I also don't believe for a second that God created over 50% of the population to have defective vision. 


AMDG

Purpose

A collection of news that tells the truth about the world, in a world that holds News as an article of Faith, but rarely gets even half the picture.
Michaelangelo maria lactans



There are many kinds of success in life worth having. It's exceedingly interesting and attractive to be ...a President, or a ranchman, or the colonel of a fighting regiment, or kill grizzly bears and lions. But... a household of children... certainly makes all other forms of success and achievement lose their importance by comparison.

Theodore Roosevelt


Babywearing Bloggers
Powered By Ringsurf




counter stats

Latest Month

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Powered by LiveJournal.com