Home

Advertisement

Older | Newer

Low-Fat is Dead.

  • Aug. 5th, 2008 at 4:54 PM
Good riddance.

Six years ago, the first blow was dealt: A New York Times piece dared to ask, What if it's all been a big Fat lie?  It came after more than a decade of banning all fat, including those now recognized as "heart-healthy," like almonds, avocados, & olives.  Gradually, we began to realize that *some* fats were okay: namely, unsaturated ones.  Then, they started to tell us that butter was better than margarine.  Now, the truth is coming out that it's trans fats & partially hydrogenated oils that are killing us.  We're even realizing that saturated fats are not the devil - Crisco & margarine are.  After decades of trial, most fats - the natural ones (butter, lard, coconut oil...)  - are finally exonerated.

Did I just say lard?  You bet I did!  

Anyway, it's starting to be seen everywhere: the low-fat fad is ending.  The most recent nail in the coffin is an article in the New England Journal of Medicine detailing a carefully controlled study which found that when comparing a lowfat, Mediterranean, & low-carb diet, the low-fat was the big loser.  Or not, actually - the low-fat folks lost the *least* weight.  The folks eating the fewest grains & sugars, on the other hand, dropped 20% off their cholesterol ratio.

The problem is, w/o fat, you feel you're starving, and worst of all, you are eating far more carbohydrates, typically the sugars & refined grains which cause heart disease, high triglycerides, obesity, diabetes, & even Alzheimer's & nearsightedness

How did we get here?  First there were the famous Ancel Keyes studies.  He reported that of 7 countries, those with the highest saturated fat consumption had the highest rate of heart disease.  Trouble is, he studied 22 countries, and threw out the ones which disproved his theory. 

Then, over the next half-century, most studies which purported to study cholesterol & disease actually lumped natural sat fats in with disease-causing unnatural ones, or, as in these two more recent studies, with "processed meats, processed grains, snack foods, & sugared drinks."  When this group turned up with more skin cancer in one study and more diabetes in the other, it was blamed on their "meat and fat" intake rather than the "processed meats, sweets and desserts, french fries, and refined grains" they were eating.

Once again, incompetent science & journalism are to blame.

I'm moving away from the fads.  Away from the nutrient chasing (counting carbs, fat, antioxidants, ...).  Toward the tried & true. 

80 years ago, a doctor traveled the world studying primitive peoples and found that no matter what they ate, from Sweden to Africa, from fish/nuts/berries to milk/meat/blood, they were all healthy - no heart disease, diabetes, cavities, obesity, tuberculosis (the killer of the day), or depression - as long as they ate nothing processed.  No processed grains (like dry cereal & refined grains), processed oils (corn, soy, canola, safflower), or processed meats, veggies, or milk.  As soon as those began to be introduced, their health began to deteriorate.  The more they ate of it, the worse it got, even when nothing else (such as work or living habits) changed.

I'm gonna eat Real Food.  That's all.

(It is rather unfortunate that the anti-sat-fat bias persuaded these researchers in the NEJM article to insist on encouraging "low-carb" participants to choose "vegetarian sources of fat and protein."  It would be most educational if they follow this up with a study comparing the AHA recommended diet, which is even more lowfat than this one, with a Real Food diet - one that allows plenty of grassfed meat & dairy, but no processed anything.)

ETA 8/06/08: Today's Washington Post on real food ...

AMDG

Comments

( 4 comments — Comment )
(Anonymous) wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2008 12:05 am (UTC)
Thanks for posting this!
I love reading Dr. Mike Eade's (on my sidebar) who explains all this stuff clearly for non-science types, like me.

Have you ever discovered the secret to getting completely off the grains??? I'm still struggling, even though I know the truth. And it burns me up when people talk about how you should give up one of the macronutrients or you won't be healthy. Hello? Fruits and veggies are carbs!

Sara
(Anonymous) wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2008 04:39 pm (UTC)
I am just now reading Eat Fat, Lose Fat and I am horrified by the whole conspiracy to cover the truth about fats just to maintain the industries that developed around the fat-free diets and lifestyle. I love a good conspiracy theory, it's true. But really, how much more is people's health allowed to suffer just so that some corporations make some money? I believe in the importance of fat and still have struggles now and then with my husband around our consumption of whole milk.
Great post.
Lori
[info]loveyourmother wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2008 04:57 pm (UTC)
Sara: adding plenty of natural fats made a huge difference. When Halloween through me over the edge again, I read & read about what worked for others and found that removing all grains for one month was a common way to success. So that's what I did starting the day after Christmas, and have only had a few sugar-binges since. Every time I fall off the wagon, I go back to no grains for a week (even whole) b/c grains feed my sugar cravings. The rest of the time, I have only occasional sourdough or sprouted or soaked whole grain products, pretty rare, since I'm still a recovering carboholic, lol!

Lori - you've got a point ... lowfat products are PRODUCTS - b/c fat comes naturally with most foods in nature - and so there is more $$ to be made. Real food has a lower profit margin.
[info]loveyourmother wrote:
Oct. 15th, 2008 06:21 pm (UTC)
typo!
Ack, how embarrassing! I must have had a child standing on my head or something; I spelled "threw" wrong! :D
( 4 comments — Comment )

Purpose

A collection of news that tells the truth about the world, in a world that holds News as an article of Faith, but rarely gets even half the picture.
Michaelangelo maria lactans



There are many kinds of success in life worth having. It's exceedingly interesting and attractive to be ...a President, or a ranchman, or the colonel of a fighting regiment, or kill grizzly bears and lions. But... a household of children... certainly makes all other forms of success and achievement lose their importance by comparison.

Theodore Roosevelt


Babywearing Bloggers
Powered By Ringsurf




counter stats

Latest Month

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com